Public Economics

Judhiana Abd. Ghani · Bhajan Grewal · Abdullahi D. Ahmed · Norashidah Mohamed Nor ·Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia ·2019

By using fiscal datasets from 1990 to 2010 in Malaysia, a panel Dynamic-OLS (DOLS) is employed to investigate the extent to which fiscal decentralisation can support state level economic growth as proposed in the Market preserving federalism (MPF) theory. Despite having a more centralised federalism system, the result strongly shows that a fiscal decentralisation variable, (i.e. a composite ratio of decentralisation) has significant coefficient and positive relationship with state economic growth. This implies that a certain degree of fiscal decentralisation in Malaysia is able to contribute to states’ economic performance by adopting fiscal decentralisation simultaneously on both dimensions of revenue and expenditure. This validates the view that decentralisation is a multi dimentional measure. The study shows that Malaysia also would be able to benefit from a system of federalism which empowers state governments to make policies for their jurisdictions and to compete with one another for better services and higher investment. Hence, competition is the mechanism that creates incentives that result from satisfying the MPF conditions and subsequently leading to the achievement of higher state economic performance.

Judhiana A. Ghani · Mohamad Khair Afham · Muhamad Senan · Asna Atqa Abdullah · Norashidah Mohd Noor ·International Journal of Economics and Management ·2021 ·JEL: H72, H77, E62, F34

The link between fiscal decentralisation and state-level economic growth has often been overlooked, particularly in Malaysia, with its highly centralised federal fiscal system. Thus, using data from all 13 Malaysian states from 2006 to 2018, this study evaluated the degree of fiscal decentralisation and examined its effects on state economic growth. This study employed a new proxy for fiscal decentralisation (FD), a composite variable FD comprising two components: fiscal autonomy (FA) and fiscal importance (FI). The model was examined using the fixed effects technique with robust standard error panel analysis. The empirical results demonstrated that FI and FD were significant and positively impacted economic growth across states. The results also showed the significant and negative impact of budget balances resulting from persistent fiscal deficits on state economic growth, signalling states' heavy reliance on intergovernmental grants and borrowings (soft budget constraints). Thus, fiscal decentralisation has enabled the state governments to alleviate the soft budget constraint problem and reduce the negative impact of deficits on local economic growth. Overall, the results supported prior findings that fiscal decentralisation had a significant positive effect on state economic growth.